Connect with us

News

Zhongfu is an impostor, its Chinese against Chinese dispute – Amosun

Former Ogun State Governor, Ibikunle Amosun, has accused Zhongfu International Investment FXE of being an impostor, alleging that the Chinese firm is involved in a scheme to defraud the Nigerian government.

Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Limited, a Chinese firm, obtained a court injunction to ground three presidential jets belonging to the Federal Government in Europe.

Amosun, in a statement on Saturday, described the issue as a “Chinese against Chinese dispute” with Zhongfu falsely presenting itself as a legitimate stakeholder in the zone.

Amosun claims the crisis began in 2011 when two Chinese companies, China Africa Investment FXE and Zhongfu International Investment FXE, engaged in a bitter rivalry over the management of the OGFTZ.

The former governor alleged that Zhongfu had resorted to “damaging and destructive” tactics, including making false accusations against China Africa Investment FXE to secure an interim management role in 2012.

He maintained that the Ogun State government under his administration acted in good faith based on the information available at the time.

Amosun dismissed claims of harassment and intimidation, attributing such incidents to the rivalry between the two Chinese companies and called on the government to treat the Zhongfu case with the same seriousness as the P&ID scandal, insisting that there is no basis for negotiation with the company.

He stated, “We have read various media accounts of the above in both print and social media. We have also read and aligned with the very appropriate responses from Ogun State and the Federal Government. At different levels, Government is a continuum and the various segments of events leading to this unfortunate situation occurred before, during and after our administration.

“Our administration assumed office on 29 May, 2011. Very shortly after we took office, two different sets of Chinese companies, Messrs China Africa Investment FXE and Zhongfu International Investment FXE laid claims to Management rights over the Ogun Guangdong Free Trade Zone (OGFTZ). The business dispute and rivalry between Chinese concerns soon became fierce, grounded seamless business activities, and threatened public peace and safety within the Zone and neighbouring communities.

“There were claims and counter claims as to who between the two was the lawful representative of the original joint venturer, Guangdong Province, China and consequentially, who had the right to manage the Zone.

“Zhongfu International Investment FXE, pretending to be a concerned and genuine tenant and Zone stakeholder volunteered very damaging and destructive information about the official representatives of Guangdong Province, the Joint Venturer and lawful Zone Managers, China Africa Investment FXE and subsequently requested to be appointed as Interim Zone Managers.

“Based on the information at the government’s disposal, Zhongfu International Investment FXE was appointed interim zone manager on March 15, 2012, pending further evaluation. The idea was to ensure that someone was in charge and thereby prevent unwholesome and untoward development in the Zone pending the completion of our fact-finding exercise.

“It was later discovered that the information and claims volunteered by Zhongfu International Investment FXE against China Africa Investment FXE were tissues of lies.

“Unknown to Ogun government at the time, Zhongfu International Investment FXE merely sought to de-market China Africa Investment FXE and to surreptitiously covet the State-owned assets of Guangdong Province in China together with the Zone ownership and management rights of their business rival.

“It was further discovered – much later – through the intervention of the Chinese Government via Diplomatic Note 1601, dated 11 March, 2016.

“The Government of the Peoples Republic of China, via its Diplomatic Note 1601 dated 11 March 2016, clarified to the Ogun State Government that China Africa Investment FXE was the rightful investor. After consulting with the relevant government organs, we followed the Chinese government’s request.

“We do recall, that Zhongfu International Investment FXE approached Nigerian courts in different jurisdictions to ventilate its legal and business rights. They lost all their four cases in court.

“We also consulted with and took advice from the State Security Services and the supervising Agency, NEPZA, on the best way to proceed. Accordingly, we served Zhongfu International Investment FXE with formal Termination Notice dated 27 May, 2016.

“For the completeness of records, we would like to mention that Zhongfu International Investment FXE went to court.

“The proceedings in Suit Nos HCT/417/2016: Zhongfu International Investment FXE Vs OGFTZ and FCT/ABJ/CS/601/2016: Zhongfu International Investment FXE Vs NEPZA & Ors will help to shed light on this business dispute between two Chinese entities, Zhongfu and China Africa.

“The final judgement in one other case, Suit No AB/04/2017: Zenith Global Merchant International Investment Ltd Vs Zhongfu International Investment FXE delivered on 29/3/2017 specifically restrained a reference to arbitration in the special circumstances of the matter being a trade dispute between two Chinese entities- Zhongfu and China Africa, with little or no connection with either Ogun State or the Federal Government.

“Not satisfied with the decisions of the various courts, Zhongfu International Investment FXE took its case, and wrote petitions at various times, to higher authorities in Abuja; the Presidency, Hon Minister of Trade & Investment; Attorney General & Minister of Justice, Inspector General of Police, EFCC, and the National Assembly (both the House of Representatives and the Senate) among others.

“We successfully defended our actions at all levels before these organs of government, and they all agreed with our position. Shortly after, our administration left office in May, 2019.

“In conclusion, without prejudice to the ongoing efforts of the Ogun State Government and the Federal Government of Nigeria, and with all sense of responsibility I wish to categorically state that:

“The agreement that was entered into at inception of the Zone in 2007 with our predecessor is what is still in operation and there was no need for any negotiation or re-negotiation of any contract when we came in and throughout our eight (8) years tenure.

” It is also not true that our administration sent police or any security agent to harass, intimidate, or beat anyone. If there was any such situation, it must have been from among the disputing rivals in the bid to outdo one another. Security agencies can further investigate the allegation and uphold the truth.

Nigeria should not give Zhongfu International Investment FXE any listening ear as doing so would amount to indulging and, encouraging an unlawful entity without locus standi to appropriate our common patrimony.

“Stemming from the above, this matter of Zhongfu International Investment FXE should be treated the way Nigeria treated the P&ID case. There is no basis for negotiation.

” I am ready to work with government agencies in any capacity to ensure that Zhongfu International Investment FXE, or any other entity, does not scam Nigeria.

“Like every Nigerian, we are concerned that a purely business dispute between two Chinese nationals and corporations has now degenerated into an unlawful attempt to appropriate Nigeria’s sovereign assets.This is unacceptable to all people of goodwill and must not be allowed to stand.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Ruud van Nistelrooy Opens Up on Hurtful Manchester United Exit Before Taking Leicester City Job

New Leicester City manager, Ruud van Nistelrooy, has shed light on his departure from Manchester United, expressing feelings of disappointment and hurt over how his exit unfolded.

The Dutchman, who stepped in as United’s interim manager after Erik ten Hag was sacked, has revealed he held an open and candid discussion with United’s new boss, Ruben Amorim, before his departure last month.

Van Nistelrooy explained that taking on the interim role was motivated by his deep connection with the club, its people, and its fans.

However, once Amorim arrived, the Portuguese manager opted not to include Van Nistelrooy in his coaching setup, a decision that left the former United striker disheartened.

“I stepped in as interim manager because I wanted to help the club during a difficult period,” Van Nistelrooy said.

“My intention was clear—I was there to assist United, and I was open to staying on in any capacity to continue that support.

So, when I was informed that I wouldn’t be part of the new coaching team, it was a tough pill to swallow.

I was disappointed, very much so, and it hurts.

”He added, “United is a club that means so much to me, and the bond I share with the fans and the people there is something I hold dear.

The only assistant managerial role I would have considered at this stage in my career was at United.

That’s why it stung even more to be shown the door.

”Despite his disappointment, Van Nistelrooy acknowledged the complexities of the situation, admitting that as a manager himself, he could understand Amorim’s perspective. “When I reflected on it, I got my head around the decision.

I understand that a new manager would want his own setup and might see my presence as a potential complication. It’s part of the job, and I respect that.

”Van Nistelrooy credited his conversation with Amorim for helping him move on. “I spoke to Ruben about it, man to man, manager to manager.

He was honest and respectful, and I’m grateful for that. It really helped me process everything and turn my focus to new opportunities.

”Shortly after his departure, Van Nistelrooy began discussions with Leicester City and was eventually appointed as their new manager.

The move, he said, has rejuvenated his spirits. “While leaving United hurt, the chance to take charge at Leicester City is an exciting new chapter for me, and I’m fully committed to making the most of it.

”As Van Nistelrooy transitions into his role at Leicester, his departure from United underscores the challenges even the most beloved figures face in football’s ever-evolving landscape.

Continue Reading

News

Obasanjo would have died under Abacha if not for me -Gowon

Former Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon has narrated how former President Olusegun Obasanjo could have been killed for an alleged coup plot in 1995 under Gen. Sani Abacha if not for him.

Gowon said this at the maiden edition of the Interdenominational Unity Christmas Carol and Praise Festival organised by the Plateau Government.

The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Obasanjo was arrested in 1995 by General Sani Abacha and convicted of being part of a planned coup to overthrow his government.

Obasanjo, despite pleading innocent to the coup, was sentenced to death.

He spent three years in prison before he was released in 1998 following the death of Gen. Abacha on June 8 of that year.

While Gowon was the Special Guest of Honour at the event, Obasanjo was the Guest of Honour, respectively.
“I wrote a letter to Abacha, I pleaded with him that God made him a leader to do good and not evil.

“I sent my wife with the letter in the middle of the night to Abacha in Abuja; I pleaded with him that such a thing should not happen.

“I’m glad that soon after that, things changed, and not only that Obasanjo left prison, he became our president in 1999.

“This is something that only prayers and sincerity can do; I’m happy that today myself and Obasanjo are here to celebrate the unity of Plateau,” he said.

Gowon also thanked the state government for organising the carol, adding that it would further unite the citizens of the state.

The former head of state said that the state had gone through a myriad of security challenges. Hence, the carol provided a suitable avenue for the people to commune.

Continue Reading

News

Why I don’t trust any public institution in Nigeria – Fisayo Soyombo

Fisayo Soyombo has revealed why he doesn't trust any public institution in Nigeria

The founder of the Foundation for Investigative Journalism (FIJ), Fisayo Soyombo has revealed why he doesn’t trust any public institution in Nigeria.

Soyombo revealed this on Saturday during an interview on Arise Television, following his arrest and detention by the Nigerian Army for three days in Port Harcourt, Rivers State before he was released on Friday.

The investigative journalist explained that everything he told the army during interrogation was leaked to suspected oil thieves who also told him the exact things he said.

“How can you grill me at the 6 division and everything I told you, the illegal bunkerers were telling me. Every single thing,” he said.

“The real grouse of the army is that one, I did not carry them along. I would not deny that I have low trust for Nigerian public institutions.”

The FIJ founder added he does not trust any public institution in Nigeria dur to his ordeal investigating stories as an undercover journalist.

“A small two-minute diversion. Last year, I did an undercover investigation on an orphanage selling babies. I bought a new born baby for N2 million. I took the baby to NAPTIP, I looked after that baby,” he said.

“After I handed over the baby to NAPTIP, I sent a representative to go there every month. Her birthday, we bought a gift, Christmas same. We woke up one day and NAPTIP shut the door on us.”

The Nigerian Army had confirmed the arrest of the investigative journalist at an illegal oil bunkering site in the Niger Delta region.

The arrest, which sparked widespread concern and condemnation, occurred during an operation against oil theft and pipeline vandalism.

The confirmation followed public outcry over Soyombo’s detention, with the FIJ reporting on X (formerly Twitter) that Soyombo had been in Army custody for three days.

Continue Reading

News

Minimum Wage: Cross Rivers Workers to embark on indefinite strike

The organized labor unions in Cross River State have announced plans to embark on an industrial action due to the state government’s failure to implement the newly approved minimum wage of ₦70,000.

This decision was confirmed by the Chairman of the Trade Union Congress (TUC) in the state, Mr. Monday Ogbodum, on Saturday in Calabar.

According to Ogbodum, the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) has set a deadline for the strike to commence at midnight on Sunday if the state government fails to meet their demands.

Speaking on behalf of the labor unions, he emphasized that there would be no backing down on the industrial action unless the government promptly implements the new wage structure.

“Yes, we are still in talks with the government,” Ogbodum said. “We had a meeting on Thursday, followed by another on Friday that stretched into the late evening. Another meeting is scheduled for today (Saturday).

However, this does not mean that all is well. While the government has shown some seriousness in addressing our concerns, our position remains clear: even if we sign any document or agreement today, it does not equate to actual implementation.

“The TUC chairman further explained that negotiations are ongoing, but the unions are prepared to join the strike should the need arise.

He stressed that labor unions are seeking tangible actions and not just verbal commitments.

Labor unions in Cross River State, including the NLC and the TUC, have expressed their dissatisfaction over the prolonged delay in adopting the new minimum wage policy.

The ₦70,000 wage adjustment was introduced to provide relief for workers amidst rising inflation and economic challenges.

Despite the federal government’s endorsement of the policy, some states, including Cross River, have been slow to implement it, citing financial constraints.

Union leaders argue that the state government has had ample time to prepare for the policy’s implementation and should prioritize the welfare of its workers.

They have warned that any further delay will be met with decisive action, as workers are no longer willing to endure the economic hardships caused by inadequate wages.

The situation remains tense, with stakeholders closely monitoring the outcome of the ongoing discussions between labor representatives and the state government.

The unions have called on the government to act swiftly to prevent the strike, which could disrupt essential services across the state.

Continue Reading

News

Bayer Leverkusen Forward Victor Boniface Faces Possible Sanction for Reckless Driving Incident

Bayer Leverkusen forward, Victor Boniface, has landed himself in hot water following allegations of reckless driving and mobile phone usage on a highway in Germany.

The Nigeria international reportedly posted a photo on social media that showed him scrolling through his phone while driving his Mercedes-Benz.

The 23-year-old’s actions have sparked widespread criticism, with fans and commentators expressing disappointment at what they described as irresponsible behavior.

The incident has not only drawn public backlash but has also caught the attention of his club, Bayer Leverkusen.

Manager Xabi Alonso has expressed his disapproval of the forward’s conduct, hinting at potential disciplinary action. Speaking to BeIN Sports, the former Real Madrid and Liverpool star did not mince words regarding Boniface’s behavior.

“I don’t like it; it’s obviously not good, and of course, it’s not allowed to happen,” Alonso stated firmly.

“I haven’t seen Boni [Boniface] yet, but he knows it’s not allowed. We have to tell him he’s not allowed to do something like this.

”The coach’s remarks reflect the club’s commitment to maintaining high standards of discipline and professionalism among its players.

Such actions, particularly those involving risky driving behavior, not only tarnish the image of the player but could also bring unwanted negative attention to the club.Boniface’s alleged use of his mobile phone while driving breaches both German traffic laws and the moral expectations placed on public figures like professional footballers.

In Germany, it is illegal to use a handheld device while driving, with violators facing fines and potential driving bans.

Additionally, as a role model to young fans worldwide, Boniface’s actions could set a harmful precedent if not addressed appropriately.Since joining Bayer Leverkusen, Boniface has been a key figure for the club, earning plaudits for his performances on the pitch.

However, this off-the-field controversy threatens to overshadow his accomplishments. Fans have taken to social media to express their concerns, with many urging the young striker to prioritize safety and uphold the values expected of a professional athlete.As the club investigates the incident, it remains to be seen what disciplinary measures will be taken.

For now, the focus is on ensuring that the message is clear: such behavior is unacceptable. The situation serves as a stark reminder of the responsibilities that come with fame and the importance of setting a positive example, both on and off the field.

Continue Reading

News

PH refinery has not commenced bulk sales  – NNPC 

The Port Harcourt Refining Company (PHRC) has not yet commenced bulk sales or opened its purchase portal, as essential processes are still being finalised.

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPC Ltd.) says an official announcements will be made if and when price reviews on the products occur.

Mr Olufemi Soneye, Chief Corporate Communications Officer, NNPC Ltd. in a statement on Friday, said currently its products being sold were originated from the Dangote Refinery.

The 60,000 barrels per day (bpd) capacity refinery began truck-out of petroleum products on Tuesday in Port Harcourt following its rehabilitation.

Some petroleum marketers and Nigerians have raised operational concern about the refinery as regards to pricing.

The Petroleum Products Retail Outlet Owners Association of Nigeria (PETROAN) also confirmed that the Refinery had not released any new price for products purchase.

The association said that it bought PMS with the old pricing template while  awaiting the new prices.

“Currently, the products we are selling originate from the Dangote Refinery and include applicable Nigerian Midstream and Downstream Petroleum Regulatory Authority (NMDPRA) fees,” he said.

“Products from PHRC are exclusively for our retail stores at this stage. Our pricing is reviewed and adjusted periodically as necessary to reflect operational realities.

“We advise the public to disregard any misleading information regarding pricing. Official announcements will be made if and when price reviews occur,”. 

Continue Reading

Trending