Josephine Otabor, popularly known as Phyna, a former Big Brother Naija reality TV star, has weighed in on the ongoing debate surrounding DNA tests in Nigeria.
This comes amidst a growing national discourse over paternity fraud, which has left many divided on whether DNA tests should become a standard practice.Using her X (formerly Twitter) handle, Phyna voiced her support for music executive Don Jazzy’s recent suggestion that DNA tests should take precedence over naming ceremonies. She firmly advocated for making DNA testing mandatory immediately after childbirth as a means to address paternity disputes and ensure clarity from the onset.In her post, Phyna stated, “I support DNA test over naming ceremony.
It should be passed that it is compulsory. Immediately after birth, a DNA test should be carried out.
”Her comments have sparked mixed reactions on social media, adding fuel to an already heated discussion about the necessity and implications of routine DNA testing. Advocates of the proposal argue that it would significantly reduce cases of paternity fraud and strengthen trust within families.
However, critics caution that such a policy might erode the foundation of family relationships and lead to privacy concerns.Phyna’s position aligns with the increasing calls for transparency in family dynamics.
Recent high-profile cases of paternity fraud in Nigeria have highlighted the emotional, legal, and financial consequences of false paternity claims.
Many believe that implementing mandatory DNA testing at birth could provide a preventive measure against such issues, offering both fathers and children certainty about their biological relationships.
Supporters of her stance point to the potential societal benefits of DNA testing, including the reduction of legal disputes over child support and inheritance, as well as fostering a culture of accountability.
On the other hand, some argue that mandatory testing could stigmatize families and create unnecessary distrust, particularly in situations where paternity is not in question.
Phyna’s statement has also reignited discussions about the role of government in personal matters.
If such a policy were to be implemented, it would require legal backing, infrastructure, and funding to ensure the accessibility and accuracy of DNA testing for all Nigerians.
The debate continues to divide public opinion, with many Nigerians sharing their perspectives on the social, moral, and financial implications of making DNA tests compulsory.
For now, Phyna’s bold advocacy has succeeded in keeping the conversation alive, sparking discussions that may shape future policies on family and paternity issues in the country.
